Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41951730›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting lung cancer stage at diagnosis based on self-reported symptoms and background factors using machine learning models.

Tina Gustavell, Noora Sissala, Maria Pernemalm, Haris Babačić, Lars E Eriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina GustavellDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. tina.gustavell@ki.se.
Noora SissalaScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria PernemalmScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Haris BabačićScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars E ErikssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to describe and compare background factors and symptoms at diagnosis of patients with non-advanced or advanced stage lung cancer and patients without cancer, and to develop predictive models identifying key variables that contribute to the detection of early and late-stage lung cancer. Univariate logistic regression and three machine learning algorithms were used. Compared to patients without cancer, six background factors and two symptoms differed in non-advanced lung cancer, while 11 background factors and 19 symptoms differed in advanced cases. The machine learning models showed moderate performance in classifying patients with lung cancer from those without cancer. Notably, top predictors extended beyond classic respiratory symptoms. Demographic and lifestyle factors, particularly age, smoking status, and living situation, remained essential alongside symptoms such as pain, appetite loss, weight reduction, and respiratory problems. These findings support integrating clinical, demographic, and patient-reported symptoms to improve lung cancer risk models and refine referral decisions in screening pathways.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMachine LearningSelf ReportAgedClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41951730
PMCPMC13065791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.