ArticleScientific reports2026
Prospective clinical evaluation of cell-free DNA next generation sequencing in patients with suspected metastatic lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular analysis of tumor material is standard in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but it is not always feasible, limiting targeted treatment options. We investigated the clinical value of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with clinically and radiologically suspected metastatic NSCLC. Within the comprehensive cancer network Southwest (The Netherlands), Erasmus MC launched the Lung Cancer Diagnosis (LCD) – cfDNA project. For patients with suspected metastatic lung cancer where tissue analysis was not feasible, thoracic oncologists submitted plasma samples for cfDNA NGS. Results were discussed by the Thoracic Oncology Molecular Tumor board. Between January 1st, 2019, and January 1st, 2023, 108 plasma samples were submitted and analyzed. In 6 patients (5.6%), an activating EGFR mutation was identified as a potential target for treatment. Additional actionable genomic alterations (AGA) include a BRAF p.V600E mutation (n = 1) and KRAS p.G12C mutations (n = 6). In 42 patients, other non-AGA (KRAS other than p.G12C, NRAS, BRAF p.G466V, PIK3CA, TP53) were detected that did not affect the choice of systemic therapy. In a real-world clinical practice setting, our study showed that NGS can detect AGAs in plasma when tumor tissue analysis is not feasible in suspected metastatic NSCLC. However, plasma diagnostics cannot replace histological diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.