Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41951710›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Effects of human-dog interactions on brain activation.

Onyoo Yoo, Jin Soo Han, Sin-Ae Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Onyoo YooDepartment of Bio and Healing Convergence, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Soo HanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sin-Ae ParkDepartment of Bio and Healing Convergence, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sapark42@konkuk.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-dog interaction brings meaningful emotional support and health advantages, highlighting its positive effects on human well-being. However, little is known about the brain activity during these interactions. This study investigated the effect of interacting with a dog on brain activity using electroencephalography. Results revealed that petting a dog and making eye contact stimulates higher brain activity in the beta and gamma frequency bands compared to touching a stuffed toy dog. The findings of this study indicate that interactions with a dog can improve attention and concentration. Our study is noteworthy for providing fundamental data to investigate human brain activity during interaction with dogs. Human-dog interactions can serve as beneficial interventions that lead to various physiological responses and emotional benefits. Based on these results, it would be meaningful to develop more structured animal-assisted interventions customized to improve attention.

Indexed as

BrainHuman-Animal BondHuman-Animal InteractionAdultAnimalsAttentionDogsElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41951710
PMCPMC13219413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.