ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Long-term prognostic value of ctDNA in early breast cancer: insights from the neoadjuvant ABCSG-34 Trial.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker in early breast cancer for assessing treatment response, minimal residual disease (MRD), and recurrence risk. In the ABCSG-34 phase II trial, we previously reported that persistent ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) was associated with higher residual cancer burden and lower rates of pathological complete response. Here, we present long-term follow-up data evaluating the prognostic relevance of ctDNA dynamics. ABCSG-34 randomized 400 patients to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, with or without the MUC1 vaccine tecemotide. Tumor-informed SiMSen-Seq assays were used to assess ctDNA at baseline, mid-therapy, and end-of-therapy. Of 145 patients with ctDNA data, 109 had long-term follow-up (median: 7.1 years). Baseline ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (HR 2.12, p = 0.043) and shorter survival durations across all endpoints. Trends toward improved outcomes were observed in patients who cleared ctDNA during NAT, though statistical significance was not reached-likely due to limited sample size. These findings support baseline ctDNA as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer. While ctDNA clearance may reflect treatment efficacy, further validation in larger trials is needed. Ongoing studies will determine the role of ctDNA in guiding therapy and monitoring MRD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.