Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41951687›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026

Long-term prognostic value of ctDNA in early breast cancer: insights from the neoadjuvant ABCSG-34 Trial.

Daniel Egle, Dominik Hlauschek, Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Christian Singer, Georg Pfeiler, Rupert Bartsch, Gregor Huber, Angelika Pichler, Edgar Petru and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Daniel EgleDepartment of Gynecology, Breast Cancer Center Tirol, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dominik HlauschekAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Simon Peter GampenriederAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Gabriel RinnerthalerAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Christian SingerAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Georg PfeilerAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Rupert BartschAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Gregor HuberBreast Center Carinthia, St. Veit, Austria.
Angelika PichlerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, LKH Hochsteiermark-Leoben, Leoben, Austria.
Edgar PetruDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Zsuzsanna Bago-HorvathAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Anna-Sophia KermanidisAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Christian FeslAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Qing ZhouCentre for Novostics, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ricarda GrafInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic, and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sabrina HammerInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic, and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nadia DandachiDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin FilipitsAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Michael GnantAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria.
Ellen Heitzer *Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic, and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. ellen.heitzer@medunigraz.at.
Marija Balic *Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), Vienna, Austria. balicm@upmc.edu.

Funding

Oesterreichische Nationalbank 16971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker in early breast cancer for assessing treatment response, minimal residual disease (MRD), and recurrence risk. In the ABCSG-34 phase II trial, we previously reported that persistent ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) was associated with higher residual cancer burden and lower rates of pathological complete response. Here, we present long-term follow-up data evaluating the prognostic relevance of ctDNA dynamics. ABCSG-34 randomized 400 patients to chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, with or without the MUC1 vaccine tecemotide. Tumor-informed SiMSen-Seq assays were used to assess ctDNA at baseline, mid-therapy, and end-of-therapy. Of 145 patients with ctDNA data, 109 had long-term follow-up (median: 7.1 years). Baseline ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (HR 2.12, p = 0.043) and shorter survival durations across all endpoints. Trends toward improved outcomes were observed in patients who cleared ctDNA during NAT, though statistical significance was not reached-likely due to limited sample size. These findings support baseline ctDNA as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer. While ctDNA clearance may reflect treatment efficacy, further validation in larger trials is needed. Ongoing studies will determine the role of ctDNA in guiding therapy and monitoring MRD.

Identifiers

PMID41951687
PMCPMC13237048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.