Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41951671›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

One-second-lead earthquake warning and impact assessment at Campi Flegrei.

V Longobardi, S Colombelli, A Zollo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V LongobardiDepartment of Physics "Ettore Pancini", University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
S ColombelliDepartment of Physics "Ettore Pancini", University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
A ZolloDepartment of Physics "Ettore Pancini", University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy. aldo.zollo@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid dissemination of earthquake information during seismic crises is crucial for mitigating the impact of earthquakes, particularly in densely populated volcanic areas, such as the Campi Flegrei caldera (Southern Italy). This region is affected by recurrent bradyseism and shallow seismicity, with recent events up to Md 4.6, very well perceived by the local inhabitants and increasing concern among the local community. In such small regions, conventional Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems face physical limitations, due to the short epicentral distances and relatively small magnitudes of the earthquakes. Here we propose and offline tested a hybrid, impact-based, on-site EEW system capable of providing rapid estimates of the earthquake size and expected impact (PGV, PGA), within one second after the P-wave detection. In addition, the proposed system extends the classical concept of an on-site EEW approach by introducing the notion of an area of competence (AoC): a circular zone surrounding the recording site in which peak ground motion is expected to fall within a user-defined range around the predicted value, and within which local users or infrastructures can effectively benefit from the warning. The proposed methodology is easily transferable to other volcanic or seismically active regions and might represent a step toward low-latency, impact-based earthquake alert systems designed to enhance community resilience.

Identifiers

PMID41951671
PMCPMC13219473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.