Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effects of robotic hand-assisted rehabilitation on motor function and daily living activities in acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06805955 (The Effect of Hand Rehabilitation Robot on Functionality and Activities of Daily Living in Acute Stroke Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Hand Rehabilitation Robot on Functionality and Activities of Daily Living in Acute Stroke Rehabilitation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, often resulting in upper limb impairments that hinder daily living activities. While conventional rehabilitation methods focus on motor recovery, recent advancements in robotic rehabilitation offer promising alternatives. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hand robot-assisted rehabilitation on functionality, fine motor skills, and daily living activities in patients with acute stroke. A parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 stroke patients aged between 40 and 60. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Robotic Hand Rehabilitation (RHR) Group or the Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NT) Group, with both groups undergoing an 8-week rehabilitation program. Primary outcomes were hand function, assessed by the ABILHAND questionnaire, and fine motor skills, measured using the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). Secondary outcomes included activities of daily living evaluated by the Barthel Index (BI), upper limb disability measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and spasticity assessed via the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). All assessments were performed before and after the intervention period. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all functional parameters except spasticity (p < 0.05). However, the RHR group showed significantly greater improvements in fine motor skills (NHPT improvement: 4.44 ± 1.18 s vs. 1.93 ± 0.90 s, p < 0.001), hand function (ABILHAND: 7.27 ± 1.39 vs. 4.87 ± 2.23, p = 0.002), and daily living activities (BI: 16.33 ± 2.97 vs. 7.67 ± 4.95, p < 0.001) compared to the NT group. There was no significant difference in spasticity outcomes between the two groups (p > 0.05). The findings suggest that hand robot-assisted rehabilitation is an effective complementary approach in acute stroke rehabilitation, particularly for enhancing fine motor control and daily living function. Given these benefits, robotic hand therapy may serve as a valuable adjunct to conventional neurodevelopmental therapy, supporting improved motor recovery in individuals with acute stroke. Further research is needed to investigate its long-term effectiveness and optimal integration within rehabilitation programs.The study was registered retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (trial number NCT06805955) on 03/02/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.