Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41951670›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Effects of robotic hand-assisted rehabilitation on motor function and daily living activities in acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Mehmet Ali Sunnetci, Burak Menek

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06805955 (The Effect of Hand Rehabilitation Robot on Functionality and Activities of Daily Living in Acute Stroke Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06805955 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Hand Rehabilitation Robot on Functionality and Activities of Daily Living in Acute Stroke Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Medipol University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsStroke, RehabilitationArmsNDT, NDT+Hand Robot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet Ali SunnetciInstitute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3554-0404
Burak MenekDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. bmenek@medipol.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-0254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, often resulting in upper limb impairments that hinder daily living activities. While conventional rehabilitation methods focus on motor recovery, recent advancements in robotic rehabilitation offer promising alternatives. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hand robot-assisted rehabilitation on functionality, fine motor skills, and daily living activities in patients with acute stroke. A parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 stroke patients aged between 40 and 60. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Robotic Hand Rehabilitation (RHR) Group or the Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NT) Group, with both groups undergoing an 8-week rehabilitation program. Primary outcomes were hand function, assessed by the ABILHAND questionnaire, and fine motor skills, measured using the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). Secondary outcomes included activities of daily living evaluated by the Barthel Index (BI), upper limb disability measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and spasticity assessed via the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). All assessments were performed before and after the intervention period. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all functional parameters except spasticity (p < 0.05). However, the RHR group showed significantly greater improvements in fine motor skills (NHPT improvement: 4.44 ± 1.18 s vs. 1.93 ± 0.90 s, p < 0.001), hand function (ABILHAND: 7.27 ± 1.39 vs. 4.87 ± 2.23, p = 0.002), and daily living activities (BI: 16.33 ± 2.97 vs. 7.67 ± 4.95, p < 0.001) compared to the NT group. There was no significant difference in spasticity outcomes between the two groups (p > 0.05). The findings suggest that hand robot-assisted rehabilitation is an effective complementary approach in acute stroke rehabilitation, particularly for enhancing fine motor control and daily living function. Given these benefits, robotic hand therapy may serve as a valuable adjunct to conventional neurodevelopmental therapy, supporting improved motor recovery in individuals with acute stroke. Further research is needed to investigate its long-term effectiveness and optimal integration within rehabilitation programs.The study was registered retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (trial number NCT06805955) on 03/02/2025.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingHandRoboticsStrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor SkillsRecovery of FunctionSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeDaily living activitiesFine motor skillsHand functionNeurodevelopmental therapyRobotic therapyStroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41951670
PMCPMC13062139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.