ArticleNature communications2026
Organic carbon recycling in subduction zones.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abiotic solid organic compounds constitute a ubiquitous byproduct of oceanic lithosphere serpentinization but their evolution and fate during subduction remains largely unexplored. Here, we assess the role of prograde metamorphism in modifying the chemical structure and isotopic signature of both biological and abiotic organic carbon hosted in sediments and serpentinites, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that these two carbon types undergo distinct maturation pathways under increasing pressure and temperature, with abiotic solid organic compounds retaining H-, O- and N-bearing organic functional groups along subduction. Notably, abiotic solid organic compounds are the sole carriers of isotopically light carbon in eclogitic terrains thanks to silicate armoring. Their recycling into the deep mantle therefore provides a plausible source for the extremely light δ¹³C signatures observed in some mantle reservoirs, including sub-lithospheric and eclogitic diamonds, and more broadly represents a key factor in generating mantle carbon isotope variability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.