ArticleScientific data2026
A Community Dataset for Large-Scale River Nitrogen Modeling in the United States.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Community Dataset for Large-Scale River Nitrogen Modeling in the United States.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water quantity predictions have advanced rapidly, driven by ready-to-use benchmarks such as CAMELS (Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large-Sample Studies). In contrast, large-scale water quality predictions, especially for nutrients, lag behind due to a lack of comparable datasets. Existing water quality datasets face four major limitations: (1) underrepresentation of human-impacted systems, (2) absence of nutrient inputs, (3) incomplete watershed metadata, and (4) sparse monitoring coverage. To address these gaps, we developed IWAND-Nitrogen (Integrated Watershed Attributes and Nutrient Data for Nitrogen) for the contiguous United States. IWAND-Nitrogen integrates 574,767 nitrate records from 1,877 catchments (median 272 samples per gauge; IQR = 231-346) with at least 200 measurements each from 1980-2023, linked with 93 watershed attributes, eight nitrogen input forcings (both basin-averaged and gridded), and eleven climate forcings. Compared to existing benchmarks such as CAMELS-Chem, IWAND-Nitrogen complements prior efforts by extending spatial/temporal coverage and enhancing representation across anthropogenic gradients. IWAND-Nitrogen aims to serve as a nutrient community benchmark, advancing from model development to new insights from catchment to national scales.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.