ArticleNature communications2026
Experimental and modeling demonstration of stronger population suppression by gene drive targeting doublesex from dominant female-sterile resistance alleles.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finding the perfect promoter for Cas9 in homing gene drives using single cell transcriptome data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Self-limiting population suppression gene drive design in the West Nile vector mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Strategies to improve the efficiency of homing gene drives with multiplexed gRNAs.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Modeling Control of Invasive Fire Ants by Gene Drive.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR homing drives can be used to suppress a population by targeting female fertility genes. They convert wild-type alleles to drive alleles in the germline of drive heterozygotes, but resistance alleles can weaken suppressive power, or even stop suppression if they preserve the function of the target gene. We use multiplexed gRNAs targeting doublesex in Drosophila to avoid functional resistance and create resistance alleles that were dominant female-sterile. This occurs because male doublesex transcripts are generated in females by disruption of the female-specific splicing acceptor. We rescue dominant sterility of the drive by providing an alternate splicing site. It is thus recessive female sterile, and has efficient drive conversion in both sexes. Dominant-sterile resistance alleles enable stronger suppression in computational models, even in the face of modest drive efficiency and fitness costs. However, we find that male drive homozygotes were sterile. Attempts to rescue males with alternate expression are not successful, though some male homozygotes have less severe intersex phenotypes. While this negatively impacts the drive, models show that it still has significantly improved suppressive power compared to standard drives. Therefore, this design may have wide applicability to suppression gene drives in a variety of organisms with intermediate drive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.