ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026
Computed tomography evaluation of periportal halo in healthy dogs under medetomidine-based sedation and alfaxalone-sevoflurane anesthesia.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periportal halo (PPH) sign on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is considered a pathological finding; however, recent studies indicate that it may also appear in healthy individuals. We hypothesized that PPH can be observed in healthy dogs and can vary depending on the anesthetic agents. This study assessed the PPH sign in healthy dogs under different anesthetic agents and across different postcontrast phases. In this cross-over study, 10 healthy Beagle dogs underwent non-contrast and postcontrast CT examinations (arterial, venous, delayed, 5-min delayed, and 10-min delayed phases) under two anesthetic agents, medetomidine and alfaxalone, with a 1-week interval. The presence and severity of PPH were assessed on a scale of 0-3 and compared across different postcontrast phases. Significant differences in PPH were noted between the two anesthetic groups. In the medetomidine group, PPH was absent in the arterial phase, peaked at grade 3 in the delayed phase, and gradually decreased thereafter in the 5- and 10-min delayed phases. In contrast, PPH was minimal or absent in the alfaxalone group across all phases. In conclusion, PPH can be detected in healthy dogs depending on the sedative or anesthetic agent. It can particularly be detected with medetomidine in the delayed phase and should not be misinterpreted as a pathological change on postcontrast CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.