SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Prevalence of respiratory viruses in stable and acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory viruses, frequently detected in asthma, are associated with worse outcomes. This meta-analysis systematically quantifies the prevalence of respiratory viruses in stable and acute asthma, across children and adults, and explores factors associated with increased viral burden through meta-regression.
methodsThis prospectively registered meta-analysis (PROSPERO-CRD42023375108) included studies employing molecular techniques to assess respiratory virus prevalence in asthma. Three databases were searched in August 2024. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.
resultsWe included 111 eligible studies. Moderate-certainty evidence indicated a pooled prevalence of any respiratory virus of 33.9% (95% confidence interval 24.8-43.7%) in children and 23.0% (12.9-35.0%) in adults with stable asthma. In acute asthma, prevalence increased to 58.8% (52.5-65.0%) in children and 49.9% (41.2-58.5%) in adults (moderate certainty). Rhinovirus was the most frequently identified virus, especially in acute asthma (45.0% in children
conclusionRespiratory viruses are common in both stable and acute asthma. This suggests that the diagnostic value of a positive viral test during acute episodes may be limited and could benefit from complementary biomarkers to improve interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.