ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Combined CMR and catheterization for pre-Fontan evaluation: comparing metrics and clinical correlations.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is increasingly used in combination with cardiac catheterization (Cath) for the pre-Fontan evaluation of children with single-ventricle physiology. The aim of this study was to describe our institutional experience of this combined assessment.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 57 single-ventricle patients who underwent CMR and Cath under the same anesthesia prior to Fontan completion. CMR and Cath-based pulmonary and systemic blood flow ratio (Qp/Qs) and aortopulmonary collateral (APC) assessments were compared. In addition, we analyzed the association between significant APC burden (>30% of aortic flow) and preoperative hemodynamics, as well as postoperative outcomes, including chest tube duration and hospital length of stay.
resultsCMR consistently yielded higher Qp/Qs values compared to Cath, with a mean underestimation of 0.41 by the latter. This difference was strongly correlated with CMR-derived APC burden (p<0.0001). In comparison, Cath-based qualitative assessment of the APC had a poor correlation with the CMR APC burden and Qp/Qs. The CMR APC burden was also associated with increased indexed ventricular volumes and lower ejection fraction.
conclusionCombined CMR and Cath provide a comprehensive pre-Fontan assessment, with CMR offering superior quantification of aortopulmonary collateral burden and demonstrating larger Qp/Qs than calculated by Cath methods. These findings support the continued use of integrated imaging modalities for individualized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.