ArticleTranslational oncology2026
Integrative analysis of urinary microRNAs for prostate cancer detection: A proof-of-concept study.
Article in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiquid biopsies analyzing circulating nucleic acids offer a non‑invasive strategy for early detection, disease monitoring, and precision medicine. Among these, urinary microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as robust biomarkers owing to their stability and regulatory effects on gene expression and tumor progression.
methodsA multi‑omics integrative analysis combining public microarray, bulk RNA‑seq, and single‑cell RNA‑seq datasets was performed to identify miRNAs differentially expressed between prostate cancer (PCa) patients and healthy controls. The diagnostic potential of these candidates was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and support vector machine (SVM) modeling. Validation was conducted through quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on urine samples from 19 PCa and 7 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) subjects.
resultsmiR-23b-3p demonstrated consistent downregulation across transcriptomic datasets derived from urine, serum, and tissue. ROC and SVM analyses indicated strong diagnostic performance. Urinary qPCR validation yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.51-1.00), sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.39-0.94), and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.42-1.00).
conclusionsThe findings suggest that miR-23b-3p represents a promising complementary biomarker for non‑invasive PCa diagnosis. Further large‑scale validation integrating transcriptomic and clinical data is warranted to confirm its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.