ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2026
Reconsidering Vitamin D Supplementation in Pulmonary Disease: The Case for Targeted Respiratory Delivery.
Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite compelling epidemiological evidence linking vitamin D deficiency to adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and cystic fibrosis, randomized controlled trials have consistently failed to demonstrate clinically meaningful benefits from oral vitamin D supplementation. This disconnect between observational associations and interventional evidence represents a significant paradox in pulmonary medicine. Recent meta-analyses have found limited protective or therapeutic effects of oral supplementation on exacerbation rates, lung function, hospitalizations, or quality-of-life measures. We propose that this therapeutic failure reflects not a lack of vitamin D's efficacy but rather a fundamental limitation in the route of delivery. Oral vitamin D supplementation undergoes hepatic metabolism and systemic dilution before reaching respiratory tissues. High expression of cytochrome P450 family 24 subfamily A member 1, the vitamin D-inactivating enzyme, in pulmonary vasculature suggests that orally delivered vitamin D may be degraded before reaching the lung lumen. The respiratory epithelium possesses complete machinery for vitamin D activation, and vitamin D receptors are expressed throughout airway epithelial and immune cells, making direct pulmonary delivery mechanistically feasible. Preclinical studies demonstrate that nebulized or inhaled vitamin D reduces inflammation, protects epithelial barrier function, and improves lung function in murine models of respiratory disease without producing off-target systemic effects or hypercalcemia. Direct lung delivery of vitamin D represents an unexplored therapeutic strategy that could transform management of chronic respiratory diseases, like COPD, by achieving local therapeutic concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure. Clinical trials investigating safety, dosing optimization, and efficacy are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.