Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950510›Full record

Observational studyJMIR medical education2026

Development and Initial Evaluation of Specific Immersive Competence in Virtual Reality-Based Medical Assessments: Exploratory Observational Study.

Verena Schreiner, Joy Backhaus, Marco Lindner, Melina Heinisch, Sarah König, Sebastian Oberdörfer, Tobias Mühling

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Verena SchreinerInstitute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-3572-5194
Joy BackhausInstitute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-6166-8973
Marco LindnerInstitute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-7567-2336
Melina HeinischChair for Human-Computer Interaction, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0067-493X
Sarah KönigInstitute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4866-9881
Sebastian OberdörferChair for Human-Computer Interaction, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8614-1888
Tobias MühlingInstitute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5660-8005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual reality (VR) is increasingly used in medical education for training and examination purposes; yet, learners' performance in VR-based assessments may be influenced by more than clinical competence alone. Immersive competence (IC) has been proposed as a relevant factor in VR-based performance assessment. While general IC captures application-independent VR interaction skills, domain-specific applications may require an additional construct, specific immersive competence (specific IC), reflecting context-dependent interaction proficiency.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and examine the initial psychometric characteristics of a newly developed in situ checklist for assessing specific IC, to explore the relationship between specific and general IC as well as related human abilities and characteristics, and to capture preliminary associations between both IC measures and medical performance in a VR-based objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station.

methodsIn this observational follow-up study, 21 final-year medical students who had previously completed a curricular OSCE including a VR-based emergency medicine station were recruited. General IC was assessed using the VR competence app, and specific IC using a checklist embedded in the original VR simulation. Additional measures included self-reported technological affinity, spatial ability, and OSCE performance scores. Analyses focused on descriptive statistics and exploratory associations, including item difficulty, item-total correlations, and internal consistency for the specific IC checklist. Pearson r was used to examine associations among variables.

resultsThe final 13-item specific IC checklist demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for an early-stage instrument (Cronbach α=0.79) and balanced item difficulty (mean P 0.56, SD 0.28). Specific IC showed a strong exploratory association with general IC (r=0.56; P=.008) and with prior 3D application experience (r=0.57; P=.007), but no relevant association with spatial ability. Both general and specific IC showed borderline, moderate associations with VR-OSCE performance (r=0.41; P=.06 and r=0.37; P=.09, respectively), while neither was related to overall analog OSCE performance.

conclusionsIn this pilot sample, specific IC emerged as a psychometrically accessible construct aimed to capture context-sensitive VR interaction skills. The proposed in situ approach offers a feasible and scalable method to assess this construct within domain-specific VR applications. Although associations with medical performance were exploratory and limited by sample size, the findings suggest the relevance of IC as a potential source of construct-irrelevant variance in VR-based assessments and support further investigation in larger, confirmatory studies.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementVirtual RealityAdultEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsStudents, Medicalexploratory studyimmersive competencemedical educationobjective structured clinical examinationsOSCEperformance assessmentpilot studyvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41950510
PMCPMC13103643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.