Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950503›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Time Savings Through an AI Speech Assistant for Nursing Documentation: Pre-Post Time-Motion Study in German Long-Term Care.

Katja Schwabe, Drin Ferizaj, Susann Neumann, Sandra Strube-Lahmann, Nils Lahmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katja Schwabe *voize GmbH, Dircksenstraße 47, Berlin, 10178, Germany, +49 331 96809186.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3385-3390
Drin Ferizaj *Department of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-7778
Susann NeumannDepartment of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8398-2408
Sandra Strube-LahmannDepartment of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1110-7228
Nils LahmannDepartment of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-5387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurses in long-term care spend up to one-third of their working time on documentation, contributing to administrative burden and limited time for direct care. Artificial intelligence (AI) speech assistants have shown potential to accelerate documentation, but longitudinal evidence from real-world long-term care settings remains scarce. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether implementing a domain-specific, mobile AI speech assistant is associated with reduced documentation time in German long-term care under routine conditions. Secondary objectives included examining usability, perceived documentation effort, interruptions, and workplace satisfaction. Methods: A pre-post time-motion study with full-shift observation was conducted. Continuous, event-based observations were performed before (t0) and after (t1) implementation of the mobile speech assistant voize. The primary outcome was total documentation time per morning shift based on direct observations. In addition to observations, questionnaires were administered to assess perceived documentation effort, interruptions, satisfaction with the documentation system, and workplace satisfaction. The primary end point was analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. Secondary, self-reported outcomes were analyzed exploratorily via paired pre-post differences with pooling across multiple imputations and Holm-Bonferroni correction. Results: A total of 52 registered nurses from 14 long-term care facilities participated (mean age 42.37, SD 12.37 years; 42/52, 80.8% female). Across 770 observed hours, the observed total documentation time per morning shift decreased significantly by an adjusted mean of 15 (SE 3.36) minutes, t46.29=-4.46, P<.001, with a 95% CI of -21.75 to -8.23, corresponding to an approximately 28% reduction relative to the baseline mean. Holm-Bonferroni-corrected exploratory analyses indicated significant declines in self-reported documentation time and interruptions, and satisfaction with the documentation system improved, while workplace satisfaction showed no significant change. Usability was rated as acceptable. Conclusions: This study provides real-world evidence from a single-group pre-post design that an AI-based speech assistant is associated with reduced documentation workload in long-term care. In this sample, the integration of a mobile, domain-specific speech system into daily workflows coincided with substantially decreased documentation time and improved perceived efficiency. Beyond these observed time savings, such technology has the potential to alleviate workload, free time for resident care, and enhance working conditions. These findings are also relevant for policy discussions on addressing the nursing workforce shortage, showing that well-integrated, speech-enabled documentation systems can support more sustainable long-term care environments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDocumentationLong-Term CareAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleTime and Motion StudiesAI speech assistantartificial intelligenceautomatic speech recognitionlong-term caremobile nursing documentationnursing documentation time

Identifiers

PMID41950503
PMCPMC13061367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.