Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950416›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2026

Reactive Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Chemistry and Materials Science.

Jisu Kim, Hyunsung Cho, Haekwan Jeon, Jisu Jung, Seungwu Han

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jisu KimDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-7380-6089
Hyunsung ChoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Haekwan JeonDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Jisu JungClimate&Energy R&D Group, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52851, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2814-1289
Seungwu HanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-0922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have revolutionized materials science and engineering, enabling large-scale and accurate atomistic modeling in various chemical systems. The performance of these potentials hinges on two key components: the model architecture, which defines the mathematical representation of atomic interactions, and the training data set, which supplies foundational knowledge. To scrutinize recent advances and chart the course for future development, this review presents a comprehensive analysis of reactive MLIPs, focusing on these two pillars. We first explore the evolution of model architectures, from descriptor-based models to state-of-the-art equivariant graph neural networks, critically assessing the essential requisites for achieving both physical accuracy and computational efficiency. Concurrently, we examine the sophisticated data acquisition strategies required to capture the complexities of chemical reactions, with a particular focus on uncertainty-driven active learning for sampling high-energy transition states and reaction pathways. Finally, beyond reviewing current methodologies, we provide an outlook on domain-specific challenges and discuss emerging opportunities in next-generation technologies, such as generative AI and cognitive autonomous agents. We believe this review will serve as a valuable guideline for practitioners in selecting and constructing MLIPs tailored for the study of chemical reactivity.

Identifiers

PMID41950416
PMCPMC13107388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.