Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950375›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2026

Predicting Momentary Suicidal Ideation From Smartphone Screenshots Using Vision-Language Models: Prospective Machine Learning Study.

Ross Jacobucci, Wenpei Shao, Veronika Kobrinsky, Brooke Ammerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ross JacobucciCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 625 W Washington Ave, Madison, WI, 53703, United States, 1 (608) 263-6321.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-7424
Wenpei ShaoCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 625 W Washington Ave, Madison, WI, 53703, United States, 1 (608) 263-6321.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9766-1473
Veronika KobrinskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5996-9719
Brooke AmmermanCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 625 W Washington Ave, Madison, WI, 53703, United States, 1 (608) 263-6321.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-6589

Funding

Advancing Real-Time Suicide Risk Detection Through the Digital Phenotyping Smartphone Application ScreenomicsR21MH129688 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI AMMERMAN, BROOKE A, JACOBUCCI, ROSS · 2022 to 2023
$430k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH129688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Passive smartphone sensing shows promise for suicide prevention, but behavioral metadata (GPS, screen time, and accelerometry) often lacks the contextual information needed to detect acute psychological distress. Analyzing what people actually see, read, and type on their phones-rather than just usage patterns-may provide more proximal signals of risk. Objective: This study aimed to test whether vision-language models (VLMs) applied to passively captured smartphone screenshots can predict momentary suicidal ideation (SI). Methods: Seventy-nine adults with past month suicidal thoughts or behaviors completed ecological momentary assessments (EMA) over 28 days while screenshots were captured every 5 seconds during active phone use. We fine-tuned open-source VLMs (Qwen2.5-VL [Alibaba Cloud], LFM2-VL [Liquid AI]), and text-only models (Qwen3 [Alibaba Cloud]) to predict SI from screenshots captured in the 2 hours preceding each EMA. We evaluated performance with temporal and subject holdouts. Results: The analytic sample comprised 2.5 million screenshots from 70 participants. Temporal holdout models achieved strong discrimination at the EMA level (AUC=0.83; AUPRC=0.77), with image-based models outperforming text-only models (AUC=0.83 vs 0.79; 95% CI 0.003-0.07). Subject holdout generalization was near chance (AUC≈0.50), though a simple lexical screening method retained modest discrimination (AUC=0.62). Smaller models performed comparably to larger models, supporting feasible on-device deployment. Conclusions: Screen content predicts short-term SI with clinically meaningful accuracy when models are personalized but does not generalize across individuals. These findings support a 2-stage clinical architecture, coarse lexical screening for new patients, with personalized VLM-based monitoring after a calibration period. On-device inference may enable privacy-preserving deployment.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSmartphoneSuicidal IdeationAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMalePredictive Learning ModelsProspective Studiesdigital phenotypingfoundation modelspassive sensingphone usesmartphonesuicide

Identifiers

PMID41950375
PMCPMC13061109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.