Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950337›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Nationwide monthly burned area monitoring in Indonesia using Sentinel-2.

David L A Gaveau, Adrià Descals, Mohammad A Salim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David L A GaveauThe TreeMap, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-2113
Adrià DescalsDepartment of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Mohammad A SalimThe TreeMap, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfires pose a major challenge for many nations. Rapid mapping of their extent is key to evaluating their impacts. We present the first operational monthly burned-area processing chain for Indonesia, based on largely automated processing of Sentinel-2 imagery in Google Earth Engine. Our approach uses a Random Forest applied to Sentinel-2 imagery and integrates FIRMS fire hotspots to reduce false positives. The resulting 20-m monthly burned-area maps cover the entire country. From January 2019 to December 2024, fires burned a cumulative 5.62 million hectares (Mha), including 2.92 Mha that burned once and 1.12 Mha that burned multiple times. This represents a total burned extent of 4.04 Mha. Compared to the MCD64A1 product, our dataset detects more burns with higher spatial detail and accuracy. In total, 122,164 hectares of primary humid forest burned, representing 2.2% of the burned area. In 2019 and 2023, fire activity accelerated around July and peaked in September-October, coinciding with Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) values ≥ +0.5 °C and Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) values ≥ +1.5°C. In contrast, neutral or negative phases from 2020 to 2022 corresponded with minimal burning. The year 2024 recorded intermediate fire activity without strong climatic anomalies. These findings confirm that climatic anomalies are associated with fire activity in Indonesia, reaffirming the importance of ONI and IOD for early warning. Our results suggest that prevention efforts are limiting forest fires, as burns in 2019 and 2023 remained lower than during earlier events. Monthly burn-scar updates are available on Nusantara Atlas (www.nusantara-atlas.org), an open-access platform for monitoring deforestation in Southeast Asia.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringFiresWildfiresForestsIndonesiaRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID41950337
PMCPMC13061323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.