Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950301›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Integrating design-of-experiments (DOE) optimization and risk assessment towards a safe and simplified electroporation protocol for Toxoplasma gondii.

Pratik Narain Srivastava, Nicholas Perewernycky, Lucca Filippo, Lianne M Lefsrud, Mark Ungrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pratik Narain SrivastavaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-675X
Nicholas PerewernyckyFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lucca FilippoDavid and Joan Lynch School of Engineering Safety and Risk Management, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Lianne M LefsrudDavid and Joan Lynch School of Engineering Safety and Risk Management, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mark UngrinFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-1491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic manipulation of Toxoplasma gondii presents unique challenges due to its obligatory intracellular nature and relatively rapid growth. Electroporation is the main technique used to introduce genetic modifications into T. gondii. However, the existing protocols require an electroporation buffer comprised of eight components and involving multiple steps of preparation. Optimizing electroporation protocols, including a readily available buffer is crucial for achieving efficient transfection while simplifying the overall process. In this study, we present a modified Opti-MEM I based electroporation buffer that matches cytomix in performance with significantly reduced variability. We also develop a novel scoring method (etScore) to reproducibly quantify electroporation performance, combining transgene gene expression with cell viability. We also couple the experimental work with a corresponding systematic risk assessment and argue for routine use of such tools in similar contexts. We anticipate this protocol will make genetic modification of T. gondii more accessible to the international community, accelerating drug and vaccine research.

Indexed as

ElectroporationToxoplasmaAnimalsHumansRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41950301
PMCPMC13086436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.