ArticlePloS one2026
Mn-modified phosphomolybdates by hydrothermal route for pseudocapacitor application.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, hydrothermal method was used to synthesize Mn modified organic-inorganic phosphomolybdates, Product-1 and 2, as considered to be, [Mnx(Imi)y{PMo12O40}], [Mnx(Imi)y{P2Mn2Mo12O50}] with Product-3, which was considered to be mixed by-products, might have [Mnx(Imi)y{P2Mn2Mo12O50(Imi)4Na4(OH)8}(OH)z] (majority) in its structure, (imi = imidazole). Product-1 was the main product, Product-2 and 3 were prepared from the by-product using only heating followed by concentrating technique. All products had high temperature resistance. According to XPS data, the percentages of Mo, Mn, C, O, P, N and Na were 3.91, 23.30, 13.54, 47.83, 7.9, 2.30, and 1.15%, 20.10, 2.39, 22.98, 41.53, 3.53, 6.83, and 2.6%, and 15.51, 1.06, 31.29, 43.56, 1.84, 5.58, and 0.58%, in Product-1, 2 and 3, respectively (by the no. of atoms), along with the average valency states of Mn were 2.26, 2.39, and 2.14, respectively. Product-1 was considered having polyoxo kegging clusters, Product-2 and 3 were considered having polyoxohexamolybdate units in their structures, as well as Product-2 was deliberately assumed to be the polymer or a derivative of Product-3. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) showed all three compounds having different reversible pseudo-capacitor character. At 2.0 Ag-1 current density, Product-1, 2 and 3@GCE showed specific discharge capacitance of 37.01, 380.45, and 635.37 Fg-1, respectively. In galvanostatic charging-discharging (GCD), Product-1@GCE showed comparatively higher retention as compared to other electrodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.