ArticlePloS one2026
Perceptions of Chinese higher-vocational nursing program directors on digital transformation: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, most research on digital transformation in higher vocational education conducts macro-level analyses, and few comprehensive studies specifically address higher vocational nursing education. Moreover, research is notably lacking on the perceptions of Chinese higher vocational nursing program directors, and the prevalent utilization of digital tools within this field remains underexplored.
objectiveTo understand the perceptions and experiences of higher vocational nursing program directors regarding the use of digital transformation tools in nursing education.
methodsThis qualitative study employed semistructured interviews conducted with 14 program directors from higher vocational nursing programs. The interview data were transcribed, and Colaizzi's seven-step method was used for a subject analysis.
resultsThe study employed Colaizzi's seven-step framework for inductive thematic analysis, with coding conducted collaboratively until data saturation was achieved. Analysis revealed four principal themes: (1) Recognition of digital education by program directors, where enthusiasm for enhanced engagement and transcended geographical barriers coexisted with unspoken doubts about resource quality and the authenticity of student participation; (2) Perceived status and impact of digital infrastructure, characterized by significant hardware investments yet inconsistent resource quality and utilization-revealing a fundamental gap between technological abundance and meaningful pedagogical integration; (3) Systemic Tensions and Barriers, exposing profound contradictions between policy aspirations and classroom realities, generational divides in educational philosophies among teachers, and persistent disconnects between technology's promise and its operational friction, all of which contributed to increased workloads and a pervasive sense of professional role dissonance; (4) Strategic Approaches to Digital Transformation, centered on increasing investment, fostering educator development, promoting resource sharing, and strengthening industry-education integration.
conclusionHigher vocational nursing program directors recognize the value of digital education, yet its adoption is constrained by challenges in platform usability and a lack of supportive institutional incentives. Effective transformation requires systemic strategies that enhance the digital ecosystem's ease of use, align professional rewards with innovation, and promote cross-sector collaboration to develop pedagogically sound resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.