ArticlePloS one2026
Single-cell analysis of inhibitory efferent neurons of the zebrafish lateral line.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct transcriptional programs define cranial motor neuron subtypes during vertebrate development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The zebrafish lateral line system is a sensory network made up of neuromasts, which contain hair cells to detect water flow. Neuromasts signal via sensory afferent neurons and their activity is modulated by efferent neurons. Inhibitory efferent neurons consist of REN, ROLE, and RELL cells and previous work has shown that neuromasts can be innervated by multiple efferent neurons, suggesting potential functional differences. To explore this, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on REN, ROLE, and RELL neurons in 5-day-old zebrafish larvae. GO analysis across differentially expressed genes did not reveal pathways that suggest differences in cellular function. Comparing markers for neurotransmitter phenotype showed all inhibitory efferent neurons to be cholinergic, but also expressed genes related to other neurotransmitters. Expression of selected genes related to rhombomere location, axon guidance, or gap junctions was similar across efferent neurons. Expression of genes encoding proteins related to membrane potential suggest that REN neurons might be more sensitive to glutamate and may have different action potential dynamics, although functional validation remains to be done. In addition, we assessed neuromast innervation by ROLE and RELL neurons. We found that both ROLE and RELL neurons synapse to approximately 50% of hair cells within a neuromast, compared to approximately 75% innervation by all inhibitory efferent neurons combined. In addition, we did not observe flow polarity bias by innervating efferent axons. However, we did find that RELL neurons had a lower number of synaptic boutons compared to ROLE, which may reflect differences in synaptic output capacity. Taken that our transcriptional analysis did not reveal major intrinsic molecular differences, but we did observe differences in neuromast innervation, raises the possibility that functional differences, if present, may come from upstream inputs. Future work, such as retrograde tracing, could help map these input partners and clarify how different types of efferent neurons contribute to sensory modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.