Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950190›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The influence of psychological ownership on pride in a Citizen Science project on wildlife ecology.

Hannah Greving, Till Bruckermann, Anke Schumann, Milena Stillfried, Konstantin Börner, Robert Hagen, Sophia E Kimmig, Miriam Brandt, Joachim Kimmerle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hannah GrevingInstitute of Education, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5487-9506
Till BruckermannInstitute of Education, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Anke SchumannScience Management, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Milena StillfriedDepartment of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Konstantin BörnerDepartment of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Robert HagenDepartment of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Sophia E KimmigDepartment of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Miriam BrandtScience Management, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Joachim KimmerleKnowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary engagement is crucial for committed participation in Citizen Science (CS) projects. So far, the CS literature has argued that psychological ownership (i.e., subjective feelings of owning or possessing an object or entity) facilitates engagement in CS projects and is beneficial for several outcomes, such as attitudes toward CS. This paper argues that, as ownership is a self-relevant experience and facilitates effort and engagement, it should increase self-focused outcomes, such as the self-conscious emotion of pride. This is highly relevant for the CS context due to its voluntary character. In turn, pride may have uplifting effects and may trigger more engagement. Therefore, the research presented here investigated the interrelations between psychological ownership and pride in five two-month long, two-wave longitudinal field studies of a CS project on urban wildlife ecology using cross-lagged panel analyses of the data of 508 participants. It was hypothesized that ownership predicts pride over time and not vice versa, as ownership increases engagement, which in turn would trigger pride. It was found that, across all field studies combined, ownership had indeed a positive, time-lagged influence on pride. Thus, when CS participants voluntarily engage in a CS project that feels like their own, they also subsequently feel proud, which can motivate further voluntary CS engagement. The implications for the CS context are discussed.

Indexed as

Animals, WildCitizen ScienceEcologyEmotionsOwnershipAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41950190
PMCPMC13061196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.