ArticlePLOS global public health2026
An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative study and modified Delphi approach.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategic research leadership and research capacity enhancement in Ugandan universities: a systematic review.F1000Research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contributions from healthcare professionals in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to global health research remain disproportionately low. We conceptualized the TIMER-2C framework to capture the multi-level barriers and facilitators shaping research productivity among local healthcare professionals in MENA and SSA. We conducted qualitative interviews using a modified Delphi approach comprising two rounds to: 1) identify barriers and facilitators, and 2) establish consensus on the most prominent factors influencing research productivity. We purposively sampled 17 participants from Jordan, Qatar, Egypt, Lebanon, North Sudan, South Sudan, Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, South Africa and India. Interview guides were grounded in theoretical frameworks. Transcripts were analyzed for barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for increasing research output. Barriers and facilitators to research productivity occurred at individual, institutional, national, and global levels. Key barriers included limited time, funding, mentorship, and research training; institutional prioritization of clinical and teaching duties over research; lack of national investment and supportive policies; and global challenges in funding, publishing, and collaboration. Facilitators included personal motivation, protected time, access to training and mentorship, institutional support for research, national funding strategies, and meaningful global partnerships that value local contributions. We identified six themes and one overarching theme from which we coined the TIMER-2C framework: 1) Time, 2) Instability, Interest & Infrastructure, 3) Money & Resources, 4) Expertise & Experience, 5) Recognition, and 6) constructive Collaboration, together fostering a positive research Culture (2C). Research culture emerged as an overarching influence on research contributions. We unveil an emerging framework, the TIMER-2C, that depicts relationships among multilevel factors shaping research productivity and offers a useful tool to guide and evaluate local capacity-building strategies. We recommend further application of this framework to guide the design, implementation and evaluation of multi-pronged strategies to enhance research contributions from MENA, SSA, and similar contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.