Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950167›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Promoting energy conservation through attention control and construct activation: A field test at a campus laundry.

Steven G Buzinski, Tatum A Jolink, Olivia C Smith, Amit M Ariely, Paschal Sheeran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven G BuzinskiDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-3853
Tatum A JolinkDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Olivia C SmithDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Amit M ArielyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Paschal SheeranDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing the frequency of laundering in cold water has been demonstrated to reduce energy consumption, but heated water laundering rates remain high. This is particularly true in wealthy, western nations. This paper describes an individual-level, situated intervention utilizing attentional control and construct activation to motivate cold water laundering. In Study 1, we report the first direct observational study of laundering in a field setting, finding that (a) only 21% of laundry loads were washed with cold water, and (b) behavioral, normative, and control beliefs were associated with laundering in cold water. In Study 2, we report an experimental field test of an intervention designed to increase rates of cold-water laundering. The intervention significantly increased cold water laundering (57%) compared to a control condition (25%). We also tested mediators of the intervention and laundering behavior association and observed that control beliefs fully mediated the relationship. We discuss the theoretical and practical contribution of these studies to the environmental psychology and motivational science literatures.

Indexed as

AttentionConservation of Energy ResourcesLaunderingCold TemperatureHumansMotivation

Identifiers

PMID41950167
PMCPMC13061205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.