ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Chromosome-specific drift under stabilizing selection generates polygenic barriers to sex chromosome turnover.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative system drift.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While sex chromosome systems show frequent evolutionary transitions in some clades, in many others they show long-term stability. Previous explanations of this stasis rely on evolutionary dynamics peculiar to sex chromosomes, such as the accumulation of deleterious mutations on the sex-specific chromosome or sexually antagonistic mutations on either sex chromosome. Here, I show that stabilizing selection on quantitative traits promotes stability of sex chromosome systems. The reason is that stabilizing selection, while keeping the value of the trait near its optimum, allows individual chromosomes' contributions to the trait to drift, and this chromosome-specific drift reduces the fitness of the novel sex-determining genotypes necessarily produced during sex chromosome turnover. Given the ubiquity of stabilizing selection on quantitative traits, chromosome-specific drift could play a pivotal role in preventing the turnover of sex chromosome systems across multiple stages of their evolution. The theory generates several testable predictions for the evolution of sex chromosome systems that align well with observed phylogenetic patterns. For example, although chromosome-specific drift acts as a global impediment to sex chromosome turnover, those turnovers that do occur should be more likely to maintain the system of heterogamety than to change it. The theory further predicts a higher rate of transitions from environmental to genetic sex determination, versus the reverse. Finally, the theory shows that the evolution of sexual dimorphism in complex traits can drive long-term sex chromosome stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.