SynthesisJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
Ocular Findings During Vestibular Testing in Vestibular Migraine: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ImportanceVestibular migraine (VM) is diagnosed using limited consensus-based criteria and presents with symptoms that overlap those of other vestibular disorders. Accurate diagnosis of VM is important to facilitate adequate and timely symptom management as well as to avoid mismanagement.ObjectiveTo characterize ocular findings during vestibular testing in adults with VM.DesignSystematic review.SettingThis systematic review was completed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Database searches of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were conducted.ParticipantsStudies evaluating participants with a diagnosis of definite or probable VM and no concomitant vestibular disorders were included.Intervention or ExposuresPositioning tests, positional tests, caloric testing, and video head impulse testing (vHIT).Main Outcome MeasuresPositioning and positional testing of nystagmus, caloric testing for unilateral weakness, as well as vHIT gain and saccades.ResultsThis review included 31 studies. Positioning testing nystagmus was present in 2% to 100% of patients during Dix-Hallpike (DH) and in 7.9% to 37.5% of patients during the supine head roll testing (SHRT). Nystagmus direction, when present during DH and SHRT, included horizontal, vertical, and torsional nystagmus. Positional testing nystagmus was present in 0% to 100% of patients during upright positional testing and in 42.1% to 95.5% of patients during supine positional testing. Horizontal, vertical, and torsional nystagmus in upright positional testing and direction-changing nystagmus in supine positional testing were observed. Unilateral weakness was present in 0% to 100% of patients; however, most studies reported a rate of <50% of unilateral weakness in tested patients. During vHIT, both abnormal gain and corrective saccades were observed, with the latter being more common.Conclusion and RelevanceVM can present with ocular movement patterns seen in both central nervous system disorders and peripheral vestibular system disorders on vestibular testing. Future studies should focus on further describing the characteristics of nystagmus and associated symptoms experienced during vestibular testing in VM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.