Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949865›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Hormone Therapy After Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk in Women With BRCA Pathogenic Variant.

Shira Regev-Sadeh, Rachel Michaelson-Cohen, Dana Madorksy-Feldman, Eitan Friedman, Shunit Armon, Amalfi Qarawani, Naama Srebnik, Joul Haddad, Vered H Eisenberg, Yakir Segev

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shira Regev-SadehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Rachel Michaelson-CohenThe Fuld Family Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dana Madorksy-FeldmanMeirav High Risk Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Eitan FriedmanMeirav High Risk Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Shunit ArmonFaculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amalfi QarawaniRuth and Bruch Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Naama SrebnikFaculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Joul HaddadDepartment of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Vered H EisenbergSchool of Public Health, Gray Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yakir SegevDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended to substantially lower ovarian cancer risk in women carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant (PV). The use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after risk-reducing bilateral oophorectomy (RRBO), although generally recommended, remains debated due to concerns about its possible role in breast cancer (BC) risk. Objective: To assess the possible association between HRT use and BC incidence after RRBO in women harboring a limited range of germline BRCA PVs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted at 3 medical centers, including both referral and primary care facilities, in Israel. Cancer-free women (aged ≥18 years) with BRCA1 PV or BRCA2 PV, with no prior mastectomy, who underwent RRBO between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2024, and who had at least 1 year of follow-up after RRBO were included. Exposures: HRT use after RRBO. Main Outcomes and Measures: First diagnosis or incidence of invasive BC. BC diagnoses were ascertained through pathology reports and diagnostic codes used in the electronic health records; some were confirmed via participant interviews. HRT use was assessed through medical records, pharmacy dispensing data, clinic visits, and telephone interviews. Cox proportional hazards regression models, with HRT modeled as a time-varying covariate, evaluated the associations with BC risk while adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A total of 919 women (mean [SD] age at RRBO, 47.6 [8.9] years) were included, of whom 496 had BRCA1 PV and 423 had BRCA2 PV. During a mean (SD) follow-up of 8.8 (6.2) years, 144 women (16%) were diagnosed with invasive BC. Overall, 381 participants (42%) had ever used and 538 (58%) had never used HRT following RRBO. Ever use of HRT was not associated with increased BC risk (combined estrogen-progestin: hazard ratio [HR], 1.06 [95% CI, 0.67-1.68]; estrogen only: HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.48-1.63]). In duration of use analyses, each year of estrogen-only HRT was associated with a reduction in BC risk overall (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99) and a reduction among participants with BRCA1 PV (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of women with BRCA PV who received HRT after RRBO, estrogen-only HRT was not associated with an increased risk of BC and was associated with a lower risk of BC among women with BRCA1 PV. Combined estrogen-progestin HRT was not associated with BC risk modification.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHormone Replacement TherapyOvariectomyAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansIncidenceIsraelMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID41949865
PMCPMC13063081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.