Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949864›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Neurodevelopmental Diagnoses Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Sloane J Freeman, Rosane Nisenbaum, Michael D Sgro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sloane J FreemanWomen and Children's Health Program, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rosane NisenbaumStrategic Partnerships in Health Excellence, Research, and Engagement, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael D SgroWomen and Children's Health Program, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns resulted in changes to the way children learned, developed, and accessed health care. Objective: To evaluate changes in rates and rate trends of new neurodevelopmental diagnoses for children in Ontario, Canada, before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study used administrative data from ICES to assess new neurodevelopmental diagnoses from March 14, 2015, to December 31, 2024, among 291 896 children aged 6 years or younger in Ontario. Exposures: The COVID-19 pandemic period, defined as March 14, 2020, to November 30, 2022, and the postpandemic period, defined as December 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly rate of new neurodevelopmental diagnoses per 1000 child-months, defined as the total number of children with a neurodevelopmental diagnosis divided by the total number of child-months. Interrupted time series analysis using data before, during, and after the pandemic was performed to evaluate changes in rate levels or slopes between study periods. Results: A total of 291 896 children received a neurodevelopmental diagnosis during the study period. Of 1 481 844 children at risk, 130 418 received a diagnosis in the prepandemic period (mean [SD] age, 2.5 [1.6] years; 79 573 boys [61.0%]); of 1 115 791 children at risk, 86 383 received a diagnosis during the pandemic period (mean [SD] age, 2.4 [1.6] years; 52 943 boys [61.3%]); and of 1 014 792 children at risk, 75 095 received a diagnosis in the postpandemic period (mean [SD] age, 2.7 [1.6] years; 45 030 boys [60.0%]). In the prepandemic period, rates of neurodevelopmental diagnoses increased monthly (slope = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03-0.05; P < .001). In the first month of the pandemic, rates of neurodevelopmental diagnoses decreased by 0.91 per 1000 child-months (95% CI, -1.56 to -0.25 per 1000 child-months; P = .01) compared with the expected rate in the absence of the pandemic. Rates recovered and remained stable, with no statistically significant differences in slopes between the prepandemic period and either during or after the pandemic. Conclusions and Relevance: This population-based cohort study showed no significant differences in rates of new neurodevelopmental diagnoses among children aged 6 years or younger from prepandemic rates in the pandemic and postpandemic periods. The rapid deployment of virtual care may have helped maintain health care access, facilitating diagnoses during the pandemic and postpandemic periods.

Indexed as

COVID-19Neurodevelopmental DisordersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleOntarioPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41949864
PMCPMC13063079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.