ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Optimizing preoperative assessment of salivary gland lesions: updates and practical implications in the Milan System 2nd edition.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salivary gland lesions encompass a broad clinicopathologic spectrum and remain challenging in the preoperative setting because tumor heterogeneity, cystic change, and cytomorphologic overlap may limit confident classification on fine-needle aspiration alone. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology has standardized reporting by linking diagnostic categories to risk of malignancy and clinical management, while its second edition places greater emphasis on integration with imaging and ancillary testing. This narrative review discusses how these updated principles can be translated into daily practice through rapid on-site evaluation or telecytology, cell-block preparation, focused immunohistochemical and molecular studies, and selective use of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. The available evidence indicates that cell blocks improve diagnostic yield and facilitate ancillary testing, whereas non-contributory cell blocks should alert the pathologist to possible suboptimal sampling. Comparative studies and meta-analyses further show that core needle biopsy yields higher sensitivity and lower non-diagnostic rates than fine-needle aspiration, with uncommon and usually minor complications. Overall, an integrated, imaging-informed preoperative pathway can reduce indeterminate reporting, increase specific diagnoses, and support more timely and clinically actionable management of salivary gland lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.