ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Microfluidic ocular formulation of voriconazole designed for hospital production.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal keratitis is a serious corneal infection with a limited therapeutic panel. Voriconazole, an azole antifungal, has been shown to be effective against many of the fungal strains involved in this type of infection. The absence of an ocular dedicated formulation on the market has led to the use of the sterile commercial cyclodextrin based formulation as a hospital preparation with some drawbacks. The aim of this study was to design a dedicated formulation for ocular delivery using oil-in-water nanoemulsion. A 0.4% voriconazole nanoemulsion was formulated with an oil and two surfactants, complying with the standards set by the authorities and literature. The nanoemulsion was produced using the phase inversion composition method. It was also formulated using microfluidic technology, suitable for hospital transposition. The mean droplets size was around 100 nm and zeta potential was negative. The pH and osmolality have been adjusted without destabilizing the nanoemulsion. Additionally, it was demonstrated that the formulation consists of two compartments: oil nanodroplets and residual micelles. Voriconazole was preferentially found in the micellar compartment. Finally, in vitro determination of minimal-inhibition-concentration tests were carried out on Aspergillus and Fusarium fungal species and compared to the 1% current hospital preparation. These tests showed that our formulation was no less effective than the hospital preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.