Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949745›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2026

Updating radiographic parameters for the healthy growing hip: are current parameters still valid?

Konstanze Hütter, Maria Anna Smolle, Sophie Butter, René Schroedter, Sebastian Tschauner, Tanja Kraus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Konstanze HütterDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Maria Anna SmolleDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. mariaanna.smolle@uniklinikum.kages.at.
Sophie ButterDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
René SchroedterDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian TschaunerDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Tanja KrausDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate whether the acetabular angle (AA) by Tönnis and lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) by Wiberg-key radiographic parameters in pediatric hip assessment-have changed in a contemporary pediatric population compared with historical reference values, considering trends in earlier skeletal maturation and body composition. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective diagnostic accuracy study assessed changes in AA and center-edge angle (CE) angles in a contemporary cohort. A total of 1774 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs (3548 hips) from patients aged 0-18 years without hip pathology were analyzed. Radiographs were obtained between 2006 and 2018 and measured using the Supervisely digital platform. Standardized anatomical landmarks were applied. Data were stratified by age and sex and compared with historical values using two-sample t-tests (p < 0.05). To minimize measurement bias, two independent observers conducted all assessments using standardized digital protocols.

resultsA total of 1774 patients aged 0-18 years (mean age, 8.30 ± 5.20 years; 666 females, 1108 males) were evaluated. AA values did not show statistically significant differences in 11 of 16 age groups compared with historical data (p > 0.05). In contrast, LCEAs were significantly higher in the contemporary cohort, especially in the 5-8, 9-12, and 12-16 age groups (all p < 0.01), indicating a trend toward earlier or increased acetabular ossification and femoral head coverage.

conclusionsLCEA values were significantly higher in the contemporary pediatric cohort compared with historical data, while AA values remained stable across most age groups. These findings suggest that current radiographic reference standards for LCEA may warrant reassessment to ensure accurate dysplasia assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level 3 (diagnosis).

Indexed as

AcetabulumHip JointAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRadiographyReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesAcetabular angleLateral center–edge anglePediatric hipRadiographic parametersReference valuesSkeletal maturation

Identifiers

PMID41949745
PMCPMC13219683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.