Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949696›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Assessment of multi-parameter dual-energy CT in predicting muscle invasion in bladder cancer: comparison with VI-RADS.

Mingyang Sun, Jian Wang, Jiawen Luo, Shengyuan Lai, Lei Wang, Yajie Liu, Xueling Wen, Caiyun Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mingyang Sun *Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.
Jian Wang *Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.
Jiawen LuoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China. kaoyan2006succeed@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9533-0592
Shengyuan LaiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China. drlsy@126.com.
Lei WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China. wanglei3791@163.com.
Yajie LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China. liuyajie40@163.com.
Xueling WenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.
Caiyun YuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2024-MSLH-083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPreoperative differentiation of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is challenging. This study explores the application of the Dual-Energy CT (DECT) model and the vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) in assessing MIBC and compares their diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis single-center prospective study included 105 patients (33 MIBC and 72 non-MIBC cases). Two radiologists independently performed DECT morphological assessment, and evaluated quantitative DECT parameters and VI-RADS scores, blinded to the pathological findings. A DECT-based model was constructed by integrating independent quantitative predictors with tumor diameter (D). Diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were performed for equivocal VI-RADS 3-4 cases and small lesions (D < 3 cm).

resultsVI-RADS achieved an AUC of 0.926 (sensitivity 0.970) but low specificity (0.542). The DECT model showed moderate performance (AUC = 0.761). However, the DECT + D model achieved an AUC of 0.925, comparable to VI-RADS (p > 0.05), with improved specificity (0.833). Crucially, in equivocal VI-RADS 3-4 cases, DECT + D (AUC = 0.904) significantly outperformed VI-RADS (AUC = 0.652, p < 0.05), while standalone DECT achieved an AUC of 0.824. For D < 3 cm, DECT + D (AUC = 0.895) and DECT (AUC = 0.857) were comparable to VI-RADS (AUC = 0.866), but DECT maintained high specificity (0.934). A nomogram and web-based risk calculator were developed.

conclusionThe DECT-based model achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to VI-RADS and demonstrates superior stability in clinically challenging subgroups. It serves as a robust, objective alternative for preoperative bladder cancer staging, particularly beneficial for patients with MRI contraindications. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates that a quantitative DECT-based model provides an accurate, objective alternative to MRI for preoperative bladder cancer staging, mitigating diagnostic ambiguity in clinically equivocal cases and ensuring accurate risk stratification in small lesions. KEY POINTS: Preoperative differentiation of muscle invasion is critical for bladder cancer management. The DECT-based model yields diagnostic accuracy statistically comparable to VI-RADS. The DECT-based model improves diagnostic confidence in VI-RADS 3-4 lesions.

Indexed as

Dual-energy Computed TomographyMuscle-invasive bladder cancerVesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System

Identifiers

PMID41949696
PMCPMC13062054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.