ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Forensic age estimation at the 15- and 18-year thresholds using MRI of the wrist: application of the Vieth staging method.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to assess distal radial epiphyseal fusion on MRI based on the Vieth staging method and to evaluate the relevance of the obtained findings for determining legal majority in forensic age estimation.
methodsWrist images obtained via a 1.5 T MRI scanner were retrospctively evaluated by two independent observers in a study population of 516 cases (252 females, 264 males) aged 10–28 years, following the application of exclusion criteria. MR images were independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists, with intraobserver agreement assessed through repeat evaluation after one month and consensus assessment performed jointly by both observers. Intra- and interobserver agreement rates were evaluated using Cohen’s kappa and linear weighted kappa statistics. Descriptive statistics, including minimum, maximum, mean ± standard deviation, 95% confidence interval, and median, were defined for age distribution. Sex-specific age differences within each stage were analyzed using either the Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test.
resultsDescriptive age statistics were evaluated separately for females and males. No significant sex-related age difference was observed at stage 2, whereas males were significantly older than females at all subsequent stages. Inter- and intraobserver agreement assessment was very good, with high agreement levels observed for both analyses. CONLUSION: The findings indicate that the Vieth staging method applied to wrist MRI may be applicable for forensic age estimation at the 15- and 18-year legal thresholds in both sexes. However, further validation in diverse populations using balanced age groups and experienced observers is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.