ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Predicting minimal clinically important difference after hip arthroscopy: logistic regression versus machine learning.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHip arthroscopy outcomes for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) remain heterogeneous, with 30-40% of patients failing to achieve meaningful improvement. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using routine preoperative variables, and to compare logistic regression with machine learning algorithms.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 310 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI (2010-2024) at a single institution. Predictor variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), morphological etiology, preoperative pain (VAS), and Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL). The outcome was achievement of MCID (≥ 9-point improvement in HOS-ADL). We developed logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting models. Internal validation used 10-fold stratified cross-validation. Temporal external validation used 80% of patients for training and 20% for testing.
resultsMean age was 39.7 ± 12.0 years; 59.7% were male. MCID was achieved by 213 patients (68.7%). Lower preoperative HOS-ADL (OR 0.911, 95% CI 0.883-0.940, p < 0.001) and lower BMI (OR 0.846, 95% CI 0.771-0.928, p < 0.001) independently predicted MCID achievement. Logistic regression achieved AUC 0.804 (95% CI 0.76-0.85) on internal validation and AUC 0.819 on temporal external validation (accuracy 81.4%). Logistic regression outperformed random forest (AUC 0.787) and gradient boosting (AUC 0.777). Calibration was excellent.
conclusionA parsimonious logistic regression model using routine preoperative variables demonstrated excellent and externally validated discriminative ability for predicting MCID after hip arthroscopy. The model outperformed machine learning algorithms while maintaining superior interpretability. The developed nomogram provides a practical tool for individualized outcome prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41949626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.