Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949619›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Transitioning to adolescent and young adult or adult cancer survivorship care: A systematic review of contemporary guidelines and trials.

Darren Haywood, Jessica Hammersley, Ursula M Sansom-Daly, Jordana McLoone, Evan Dauer, Helen Wilding, Nicolas H Hart, Thomas Walwyn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Darren HaywoodHuman Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Driver Avenue, Moore Park, Sydney, NSW, 2030, Australia. darren.haywood@uts.edu.au.
Jessica HammersleySchool of Nursing, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Ursula M Sansom-DalyBehavioural Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, UNSW Medicine & Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Jordana McLooneBehavioural Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, UNSW Medicine & Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Evan DauerHuman Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Driver Avenue, Moore Park, Sydney, NSW, 2030, Australia.
Helen WildingLibrary Service, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Nicolas H HartHuman Performance Research Centre, INSIGHT Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Driver Avenue, Moore Park, Sydney, NSW, 2030, Australia.
Thomas WalwynDivision of Paediatrics, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

Cancer Institute NSW 2020/ECF1163Cancer Institute NSW 2025/ECF2620National Health and Medical Research Council APP2017080University of Technology Sydney PRO25-23000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth service transitions of child, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors between paediatric and adult cancer care services are pervasively fragmented, resulting in poor coordination, reduced satisfaction, and adverse outcomes for cancer survivors and significant others (e.g., caregivers and family members). Numerous trials and clinical guidelines have been developed to support care transitions, but their convergence, divergence, and methodological quality remain unclear. To advance clinical practice and quality research about care transitions, a synthesis of trials and guidelines on child, adolescent, and young adult care transition across age-appropriate cancer services is required to inform future research, practice, guideline, and policy development.

methodsA systematic review (CRD420251029796) was conducted. Studies were identified from searches of six bibliographic databases, four trial registers, and grey literature. Inclusion criteria focused on clinical guidelines or trials published between January 2020 and April 2025 that addressed age-related transitional cancer care.

resultsA total of 3706 records were identified. After screening, 18 records met the inclusion criteria: 10 clinical guidelines, 4 completed trials, and 4 ongoing trials with registrations. While general recommendations between guidelines were consistent, they diverged in detail relating to their local contexts. Only two ongoing trials, and no completed studies, included independent control groups.

conclusionCompleted trials were limited and highly variable in approach, components, and outcome measures, suggesting regionally specific guidelines enhance relevance, applicability, and transition practices. Future research should develop core outcome sets for care transition trials to facilitate comparison of outcomes and should develop robust study designs, including control groups.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicTransition to Adult CareAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildClinical Trials as TopicHumansSurvivorshipYoung AdultAdolescentAYACancerGuidelinePaediatricServiceSurvivorshipTransitionTrialsYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID41949619
PMCPMC13061783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.