Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949610›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Improving the recognition of child maltreatment in emergency departments in Europe: healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators for implementation of a comprehensive toolkit design.

F Hoedeman, P J Puiman, A W Smits, M I Dekker, D Lauwaert, R Oostenbrink, N Parri, L García-Castrillo Riesgo, S Polinder, H A Moll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F HoedemanDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. f.hoedeman@erasmusmc.nl.
P J PuimanDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A W SmitsAugeo Foundation, Driebergen, The Netherlands.
M I DekkerAugeo Foundation, Driebergen, The Netherlands.
D LauwaertEmergency Department, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
R OostenbrinkDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N ParriMeyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
L García-Castrillo RiesgoEmergency Department, University Hospital Marques Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain.
S PolinderDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
H A MollDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies to improve child maltreatment recognition in emergency departments (EDs) have been associated with increased detection. However, implementing new protocols in high-pressure environments is challenging, necessitating an understanding of healthcare professionals' perceptions. This study explored perceived barriers and facilitators for implementing a child maltreatment toolkit design in European EDs. The presented toolkit design included the Screening instrument for Child Abuse & Neglect (SCAN), training, and hospital policy. To assess barriers and facilitators for its implementation, a survey was developed using the 'Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument' featuring statements on a 5-point Likert scale with additional open-ended questions. This pre-implementation survey was distributed to ED professionals through European emergency medicine societies and research networks (EUSEM, REPEM, and EuSEN) and additional contacts via snowball sampling. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses of open-ended responses were conducted. A total of 204 respondents participated, representing 121 hospitals from 28 European countries (estimated response 36%-46%). Facilitators for implementation included the toolkit's alignment with the ED environment, covering time, financial and staff resources, ED staff motivation and the hospital policy's standardized hospital-wide implementation. Thematic analyses revealed comparable benefits, but additional disadvantages including cultural differences, risk of false positives, electronic health record (EHR) compatibility and ensuring practical over theoretical learning.

conclusionThis pre-implementation study highlights generally positive perceptions among European ED professionals regarding a structured child maltreatment toolkit design. Concurrently, important contextual and ethical considerations, including screening performance, legal frameworks, system capacity and potential unintended consequences, were identified. This underscores the need for careful contextual adaptation and prospective effectiveness-implementation evaluation before broader adoption. WHAT IS KNOWN: • European EDs generally lack strategies to improve the recognition of child maltreatment. • Successful implementation of such strategies in EDs requires an understanding of healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators. WHAT IS NEW: • This study explores perceptions of European ED professionals regarding a child maltreatment toolkit design comprising the Screening instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN), targeted training, and hospital policy guidance. • Addressing training costs, cultural variability, and concerns about false positives is essential to support implementation and to enable wider adoption, enhancing pediatric readiness for child protection across Europe.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelChild AbuseEmergency Service, HospitalMass ScreeningChildEuropeFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesChild abuseEmergency departmentsEuropeScreening

Identifiers

PMID41949610
PMCPMC13061767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.