ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Improving the recognition of child maltreatment in emergency departments in Europe: healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators for implementation of a comprehensive toolkit design.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strategies to improve child maltreatment recognition in emergency departments (EDs) have been associated with increased detection. However, implementing new protocols in high-pressure environments is challenging, necessitating an understanding of healthcare professionals' perceptions. This study explored perceived barriers and facilitators for implementing a child maltreatment toolkit design in European EDs. The presented toolkit design included the Screening instrument for Child Abuse & Neglect (SCAN), training, and hospital policy. To assess barriers and facilitators for its implementation, a survey was developed using the 'Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument' featuring statements on a 5-point Likert scale with additional open-ended questions. This pre-implementation survey was distributed to ED professionals through European emergency medicine societies and research networks (EUSEM, REPEM, and EuSEN) and additional contacts via snowball sampling. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses of open-ended responses were conducted. A total of 204 respondents participated, representing 121 hospitals from 28 European countries (estimated response 36%-46%). Facilitators for implementation included the toolkit's alignment with the ED environment, covering time, financial and staff resources, ED staff motivation and the hospital policy's standardized hospital-wide implementation. Thematic analyses revealed comparable benefits, but additional disadvantages including cultural differences, risk of false positives, electronic health record (EHR) compatibility and ensuring practical over theoretical learning.
conclusionThis pre-implementation study highlights generally positive perceptions among European ED professionals regarding a structured child maltreatment toolkit design. Concurrently, important contextual and ethical considerations, including screening performance, legal frameworks, system capacity and potential unintended consequences, were identified. This underscores the need for careful contextual adaptation and prospective effectiveness-implementation evaluation before broader adoption. WHAT IS KNOWN: • European EDs generally lack strategies to improve the recognition of child maltreatment. • Successful implementation of such strategies in EDs requires an understanding of healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators. WHAT IS NEW: • This study explores perceptions of European ED professionals regarding a child maltreatment toolkit design comprising the Screening instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN), targeted training, and hospital policy guidance. • Addressing training costs, cultural variability, and concerns about false positives is essential to support implementation and to enable wider adoption, enhancing pediatric readiness for child protection across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.