Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949396›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Visuomotor adaptation and savings to constant and varying visual feedback delays in a driving simulator.

Sam Beech, Danaë Stanton Fraser, Iain D Gilchrist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sam BeechSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Danaë Stanton FraserDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Iain D GilchristSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perturbations to visual feedback disrupt one's ability to use vision to guide movement, leading to disrupted visuomotor control. The visuomotor adaptation mechanism recovers control by updating the visuomotor mapping to accommodate the visual perturbation during movement. A hallmark of adaptation is savings, where individuals demonstrate faster adaptation upon subsequent exposure to the same perturbation. Although faster adaptation to a previously experienced delay has been observed in response to constant visual feedback delays in two-dimensional tracking tasks, they have not been investigated in ecologically relevant contexts where individuals perform more complex visuomotor control tasks with varying delays. Previously, delay variability has been shown to significantly impair performance within these tasks, but it remains unclear how delay variability will impact adaptation and savings. Therefore, we investigated adaptation to constant and varying delays in a driving simulator over four sessions spaced 7 days apart. Across these sessions, participants exhibited savings, reflected in reduced average absolute spatial error, a shift in the average directional road position toward the middle of the road (instructed position), and flatter learning slopes, indicating a faster approach to asymptote. Crucially, there were no significant differences between the constant and varying delay conditions in any measure. Therefore, participants adapted to the delayed visual feedback with increased efficiency upon subsequent exposure to the same temporal perturbation. Additionally, delay variability did not disrupt adaptation or savings within the driving simulator task.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAutomobile DrivingComputer SimulationFeedback, SensoryPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41949396
PMCPMC13069349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.