ArticleJournal of vision2026
Visuomotor adaptation and savings to constant and varying visual feedback delays in a driving simulator.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perturbations to visual feedback disrupt one's ability to use vision to guide movement, leading to disrupted visuomotor control. The visuomotor adaptation mechanism recovers control by updating the visuomotor mapping to accommodate the visual perturbation during movement. A hallmark of adaptation is savings, where individuals demonstrate faster adaptation upon subsequent exposure to the same perturbation. Although faster adaptation to a previously experienced delay has been observed in response to constant visual feedback delays in two-dimensional tracking tasks, they have not been investigated in ecologically relevant contexts where individuals perform more complex visuomotor control tasks with varying delays. Previously, delay variability has been shown to significantly impair performance within these tasks, but it remains unclear how delay variability will impact adaptation and savings. Therefore, we investigated adaptation to constant and varying delays in a driving simulator over four sessions spaced 7 days apart. Across these sessions, participants exhibited savings, reflected in reduced average absolute spatial error, a shift in the average directional road position toward the middle of the road (instructed position), and flatter learning slopes, indicating a faster approach to asymptote. Crucially, there were no significant differences between the constant and varying delay conditions in any measure. Therefore, participants adapted to the delayed visual feedback with increased efficiency upon subsequent exposure to the same temporal perturbation. Additionally, delay variability did not disrupt adaptation or savings within the driving simulator task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.