ArticleeLife2026
Identification and comparison of orthologous cell types from primate embryoid bodies shows limits of marker gene transferability.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CroCoNet: a framework for the quantitative comparison of gene regulatory networks across species.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of cell types remains a major challenge. Even after a decade of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), reasonable cell type annotations almost always include manual non-automated steps. The identification of orthologous cell types across species complicates matters even more, but at the same time strengthens the confidence in the assignment. Here, we generate and analyze a dataset consisting of embryoid bodies (EBs) derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of four primate species: humans, orangutans, cynomolgus, and rhesus macaques. This kind of data includes a continuum of developmental cell types, multiple batch effects (i.e. species and individuals) and uneven cell type compositions and hence poses many challenges. We developed a semi-automated computational pipeline combining classification and marker-based cluster annotation to identify orthologous cell types across primates. This approach enabled the investigation of cross-species conservation of gene expression. Consistent with previous studies, our data confirm that broadly expressed genes are more conserved than cell type-specific genes, raising the question of how conserved, inherently cell type-specific, marker genes are. Our analyses reveal that human marker genes are less effective in macaques and vice versa, highlighting the limited transferability of markers across species. Overall, our study advances the identification of orthologous cell types across species, provides a well-curated cell type reference for future in vitro studies and informs the transferability of marker genes across species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.