Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949170›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2026

Leveraging an Electronic Consultation Program for a High-Volume Hepatology Clinic.

Jacqueline B Henson, Kara Wegermann, Amreen M Dinani, Julius M Wilder, Andrew J Muir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacqueline B HensonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA .ORCID 0000-0003-3488-6615
Kara Wegermann
Amreen M Dinani
Julius M Wilder
Andrew J Muir

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of chronic liver disease is increasing in the United States, and a concurrent national shortage of hepatologists has resulted in long wait times for specialty care. Electronic consultations (E-consults) have emerged as a strategy to expand access by enabling asynchronous communication between referring providers and specialists. Limited data exist on hepatology-specific E-consults, particularly in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 era. This study aimed to characterize contemporary hepatology E-consult use and evaluate their impact on subsequent healthcare utilization within a health system.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all hepatology E-consults completed at a large academic health system between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2024, with follow-up through June 30, 2025. Patient demographics, referring provider characteristics, clinical questions, and outcomes were extracted from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was the proportion of E-consults addressed without an in-person hepatology clinic visit within 6 months.

resultsA total of 3,011 hepatology E-consults were requested by 663 unique providers across 39 specialties, most commonly family medicine 36.8% and internal medicine 21.9%. The most common clinical concerns were abnormal liver tests (68.9%), abnormal imaging (18.5%), and metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (12.4%). Median completion time was 0 days, compared with 46 days for traditional referrals. Overall, 63.6% of E-consults addressed clinical questions without a subsequent hepatology visit, avoiding nearly 137,000 miles of patient travel. DISCUSSION: Hepatology E-consults can effectively manage many low-complexity cases within primary care, preserve specialty clinic capacity, and reduce patient travel burden. These findings highlight the role of E-consults in addressing the growing demand for hepatology expertise.

Indexed as

GastroenterologyLiver DiseasesRemote ConsultationAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesUnited Statescirrhosiscommunicationhealthcare deliveryliver diseaseremote consultationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID41949170
PMCPMC13400022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.