ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
Task shifting from general practitioners to nurses and the association with patient flow and resource use in out-of-hours primary care clinics: a descriptive register-based study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to describe patterns of patient flow and resource use in out-of-hours (OOH-PC) clinics with high versus low levels of task shifting from general practitioners (GPs) to nurses.
methodsThis descriptive register-based study used data from OOH-PC clinics in the Central Denmark Region. Clinics with high levels of task shifting had nurses independently managing pa-tients with minor conditions, whereas in clinics with low levels of task shifting nurses mainly per-formed preparatory tasks. Measures of patient flow included GP time per contact, initial and total waiting time, contact time with a health professional, and treatment time. Resource use measures in-cluded diagnostic tests, X-rays, injury-related procedures, prescriptions, hospital referrals, and fol-low-up contacts.
resultsA total of 451,714 contacts were included. The proportion of contacts independently man-aged by nurses was 4% in clinics with low task shifting and 20% in clinics with high task shifting. Clinics with low task shifting had more GP time per contact (median 8 minutes [IQR 5-11] vs. 6 minutes [IQR 2-11]) and longer total waiting time (31 minutes [IQR 14-52] vs. 26 minutes [IQR 11-49]) than clinics with high task shifting. Median contact time (8 minutes) was similar across clin-ic types. Rates of diagnostic testing, X-ray referrals, prescriptions, and follow-up contacts were comparable.
conclusionsThis study indicates that OOH-PC clinics with high levels of task shifting release more GP time and reduce waiting times while maintaining similar consultation lengths and overall resource use. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.