ArticleJCI insight2026
An at-home blood collection device for remote immune monitoring by high-parameter flow cytometry.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At-home blood collection devices (ABCDs) can facilitate study participation for remote and rural cohorts. Previous studies used ABCDs to interrogate samples by proteomics and sequencing approaches. We wanted to address the question of whether this approach could be used to assess live immune cells with high-parameter flow cytometry to enable remote immune monitoring. We first compared blood from standard venipuncture with ABCD blood draws, followed by assessment of the impact of sample shipping on immune cell viability and phenotyping. We found that capillary blood collected with a Tasso+ device and concurrently drawn venipuncture blood samples had highly congruent immune cell composition and phenotype. Shipment of Tasso+ samples via the United States Postal Service altered the myeloid compartment, but T cell numbers, subsets, and phenotypes remained remarkably stable compared with non-shipped samples. Finally, we describe a flow cytometry analysis framework that allowed for direct sample comparison even when samples were stained and analyzed over a time period of 1.5 years. Overall, our data highlight the feasibility of using ABCDs combined with subsequent flow cytometry analysis for remote immune monitoring. Additionally, our study also identifies areas that could be improved to further promote the use of ABCDs for immune monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.