ArticleOTO open
Age-Related Differences in Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Real-World Study.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Allergic Sensitization to Common Ragweed and Mugwort Pollen Allergens: A 6-Year Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Journal of immunology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate age-related differences in efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) among patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Methods: AR patients who completed a 3-year course of dust mite SCIT with a 2-year post-SCIT follow-up were categorized into pediatric and adult groups. Baseline characteristics, SCIT efficacy, and adverse reactions were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of SCIT efficacy and adverse reaction. Results: 889 patients were included, comprising 544 children and 345 adults. Adults exhibited higher baseline symptom burden, higher rates of former or current smoking and alcohol consumption, longer AR duration, more frequent dose adjustments during SCIT, and greater prevalence of comorbid asthma and urticaria. In contrast, children had higher frequencies of family history of allergy, monosensitization, food allergy, and secondary immunotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that older age, particularly adult status, was an independent risk factor for reduced SCIT efficacy at both 1 and 2 years post-SCIT discontinuation, after adjusting for clinical confounders. Adverse reactions, including both local and systemic events, occurred more frequently in children, though the majority were mild and occurred during the maintenance phase. Notably, older or adult age was independently associated with a lower risk of SCIT-related adverse reactions. Conclusion: Pediatric patients demonstrated superior short- and long-term SCIT efficacy compared to adults, along with a higher incidence of adverse reactions. These results support age-specific strategies to maximize clinical benefits and minimize risks in SCIT for AR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.