ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026
Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Commonly Asked Questions About Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation.
Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An expert-based assessment of the quality, reliability, understandability, and readability of ChatGPT responses on cerebral palsy.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the accuracy and comprehensiveness of 10 frequently asked questions posed to ChatGPT, an online chatbot, regarding obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy. Methods: Ten questions were formulated after extensive literature review alongside the guidance of the senior author (R.N.), a board-certified otolaryngologist specializing in HNS therapy. We employed ChatGPT version 3.5 to answer each question, limiting responses to one paragraph. No follow-up queries were posed. The precision and thoroughness of responses were graded via the grading scale proposed by Mika et al. (within the context of hip arthroplasty) and the DISCERN criteria. Each response was graded by three independent, blinded reviewers (L.L., D.M., and R.N.). Results: On average, the responses produced by ChatGPT were satisfactory but typically required moderate clarification (inter-rater reliability [IRR] 0.533). Of the 10 responses, only one response was deemed excellent not requiring clarification. Two of the responses were deemed satisfactory requiring minimal clarification and the remaining seven responses were all deemed satisfactory requiring moderate clarification. No response was deemed unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification. The average DISCERN score was 41.0 (IRR = 0.513), suggesting that the written health information was "average." Conclusions: The responses produced by ChatGPT were fairly accurate, but often benefited from further clarification to ensure a comprehensive understanding. Ultimately, it seems that ChatGPT currently functions as a powerful resource to aid patients in further understanding topics related to OSA and HNS therapy, but should not replace direct consultation with knowledgeable healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.