Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41948684›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026

The Effect of COVID-19 on Voice Quality: A Systematic Review.

Angelica M Mangahas, Marcus Chang, Inna A Husain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angelica M MangahasCollege of Medicine - Rockford University of Illinois Rockford Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-0173
Marcus ChangSchool of Medicine University of Southern California Keck Los Angeles California USA.
Inna A HusainPowers Health Group Department of Otolaryngology Munster Indiana USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect of COVID-19 on voice by evaluating acoustic, aerodynamic, auditory-perceptual, and patient-reported measurements for COVID-19 patients compared to controls. Data Sources: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Embase. Review Methods: Studies were reviewed for acoustic, aerodynamic, auditory-perceptual, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Seven studies met criteria. There were 790 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and 484 controls. Acoustic measurements revealed that COVID-19 patients had an increased harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR) (27.14 vs. 41.37 dB), and increased fundamental frequency (177.66 vs. 172.81 Hz), jitter (0.73 vs. 0.31), and shimmer (4.43 vs. 3.42). Auditory-perceptual measurements indicated that COVID-19 patients had an increased Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) score (11.46 vs. 2.15). COVID-19 patients also had an increased Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) score (4.89 vs. 1.59). Finally, COVID-19 patients had a statistically significant decrease in maximum phonation time compared to controls (9.94 s vs. 16.32 s, Conclusions: Although maximum phonation time was the only statistically significant measurement, other measurements were worse for COVID-19 patients. The current research suggests negative effects of COVID-19 on the voice; however, this is the first systematic review to summarize its effects with measurable outcomes. More studies with vocal measurements taken at different time points following infection are needed to understand the full long-term effect of COVID-19 on the voice. Additionally, studies evaluating voice quality for mild cases of COVID-19 with comparison to healthy controls are needed to understand its prevalence and effect as the severity of COVID-19 decreases.

Indexed as

COVID‐19systematic reviewvoicevoice quality

Identifiers

PMID41948684
PMCPMC13051893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.