ReviewHealth science reports2026
A Regional Scoping Review of School-Based Nutrition Interventions Conducted Across Nordic Countries.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: While Nordic countries have a relatively high socioeconomic status population, they are challenged by the health deficit of rising obesity and overweight among young people. The aim of this regional scoping review is to identify best practices for designing and implementing effective school nutrition programs in Nordic countries and identify gaps for further research. Methods: Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a scoping review was conducted across nine academic databases between 1980 and May 2025. Results: Fifty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, from small pilot interventions to large national or international cohorts involving thousands of students across the five Nordic countries. Conclusion: Most intervention studies were multicomponent in nature, combining individual student-focused education, changes to the school environment, and engagement with families or the wider community. The reviewed interventions consistently demonstrated positive impacts on nutrition knowledge, dietary behaviors, and in some cases, physical health indicators, though effect sizes and sustainability varied. Some schools have the advantage of a national nutrition education framework that gives consistency to the nature and extent of nutrition promotion, but all schools have found ways to include nutrition education programs in the curriculum. Government or private entity provisions of healthy meals or snacks have a significant effect on the improvement of youth nutrition, especially for students with limited familial resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.