ArticleHealth science reports2026
Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices for Surgical Prophylaxis in Caesarean Sections at Kawempe National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health threat, especially in developing countries, where limited antimicrobial stewardship programs contribute to inconsistent prescribing practices for Caesarean section (CS) surgical prophylaxis. This study aimed to investigate physicians' knowledge and prescribing practices related to CS surgical antibiotic prophylaxis at Kawempe National Referral Hospital (KNRH) in Uganda. Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was conducted among 200 prescribing healthcare providers, including obstetricians, gynecologists, residents, fellows, medical officers, and interns involved in CS procedures over 4 months in 2021. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, knowledge of AMR, stewardship practices, and adherence to CS antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. Participation was voluntary and confidential. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27, with a Results: The most commonly chosen antibiotic was ceftriaxone, followed by metronidazole, either alone or in combination, both of which are not recommended according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for CS prophylaxis. Most antibiotics were administered 15 to 60 min prior to surgery, which is also not in alignment with recommendations. Overall, the study revealed limited compliance with national and international guidelines on antibiotic prescription for CS prophylaxis among healthcare professionals, particularly regarding antibiotic choice, timing of administration, frequency, and dosage. Conclusion: The study reveals major gaps between recommended and actual antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for CS at KNRH. Despite clinicians' awareness of AMR, systemic barriers such as poor microbiological testing and reliance on peer advice hinder adherence. These findings reflect on the importance of policy development and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in Uganda to improve prescribing practices among healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.