ArticleHealth science reports2026
Evaluation of the Hyoid Bone Position Based on the Hyoid Triangle in Patients With Different Skeletal Patterns: A Lateral Cephalometry Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hyoid Bone Position in Relation to Vertical Skeletal Pattern: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: We aimed to compare the hyoid bone triangle among individuals with Class I, II, and III skeletal patterns, considering different facial growth patterns. Methods: A total of 296 patients were included in the study. Skeletal patterns were classified using the A Point-Nasion-B Point (ANB) angle and Wit's appraisal, while the Bjork angle and Jarabak index were employed to categorize facial growth patterns (vertical, horizontal, and normal). Hyoid triangle measurements-based on two facial parameters (C3-H and H-RGn) and one cervical vertebral parameter (C3-RGn)-were compared across skeletal classes and facial growth patterns. Results: Patients were classified into vertical ( Conclusion: Class II patients tend to have a more posterior hyoid bone position, except in normal growth patterns, where the hyoid position is relatively more anterior. Vertical growth patterns in Class II patients are associated with a lower hyoid bone position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.