Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41948590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Perceptions and clinical use of biosimilars among rheumatologists in ArLAR countries: a cross-sectional survey.

Asal Adnan, Nabaa Ihsan Awadh, Yasameen Abbas Humadi, Faiq I Gorial, Nelly Ziade, Ali A Younis, Ihsane Hmamouchi, Lina El Kibbi, Hussein Halabi, Chafika Haouichat and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Asal AdnanRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Nabaa Ihsan AwadhRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Yasameen Abbas HumadiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq.
Faiq I GorialRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Nelly ZiadeDepartment of Rheumatology, Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ali A YounisDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Ihsane HmamouchiHealth Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, International University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Lina El KibbiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, SMC Healthcare, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hussein HalabiDepartment of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Chafika HaouichatFaculty of Medicine El Mahdi Si Ahmed, University Saad Dahlab-Blida 1, Blida, Algeria.
Basel K MasriJordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Enas Osama Hassan OmerCollege of Medicine, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan.
Aya Ahmed ShimalRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ahmed Dheyaa Al-ObaidiRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Nizar Abdullateef JassimIraqi Board for Medical Specializations, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biosimilars are increasingly used in rheumatology practice; however, knowledge gaps and regulatory uncertainties may affect their acceptance. This study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and clinical practices related to biosimilars among rheumatologists in the Arab League of Associations for Rheumatology (ArLAR) countries. Methods: A web-based survey of 19 questions, adapted from a European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) tool, was distributed among ArLAR-affiliated rheumatologists between July 2024 and January 2025. The questionnaire assessed knowledge, attitudes, clinical use, and educational preferences. A French version was developed and validated by the study steering committee. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 105 rheumatologists from various Arab countries participated in the survey. The mean age of participants was 43.6 ± 11.7 years, and 61.9% were females. Most participants were adult rheumatologists (94.3%), primarily from Iraq (37.1%), Morocco (19%), and Algeria (16.2%). While 85.7% reported using biosimilars in practice, only 50.5% correctly identified the formal definition. Comfort with EMA/FDA-approved biosimilars was high (mean score 4.22/5), while concerns remained about switching in stable patients and among multiple biosimilars. The majority (80%) expressed interest in additional biosimilar education, particularly on regulatory approval, extrapolation, and safety. Conclusion: ArLAR rheumatologists show high uptake of biosimilars but moderate understanding of key regulatory and clinical concepts. Regionally adapted educational programs are needed to support evidence-based biosimilar use and improve confidence in clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

ArLARbiologic therapybiosimilarscross-sectional surveyhealthcare policyphysician perceptionsregulatory approvalrheumatology

Identifiers

PMID41948590
PMCPMC13050824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.